A beautifully written article on why Obama’s success proves the opposite of what many think it does. Still, I (have and) will vote for him. A passionate idealist and a well-spoken diplomat with little to no history of corruption would be a good choice for our next figurehead. And I don’t see it hurting our chances of diminishing racism in the future.
1. Define the question
Can it be proven, via scientific method, that I am awesome?
2. Gather information and resources (observe)
This intensely stressful weekend contained much empirical data that would point to me being awesome.
3. Form hypothesis
I am awesome.
4. Perform experiment and collect data
Test the first: Audition with South Milwaukee PAC.
Test the second: SAFD Quarterstaff Skills Proficiency Test, choreographed by Chuck Coyl, adjudicated by Dale Girard.
Test the third: Audition with Lakeland Players, Ltd.
5. Analyze data
Results of first test: Offered lead role upon completion.
Results of second test: Passed with partner, 7/8 weapons now recognized proficient.
Results of third test: Callback, positive feedback from directors and from others in audition, encouraging talk of possible lead role.
6. Interpret data and draw conclusions that serve as a starting point for new hypothesis
The first test gives positive empirical evidence of awesomeness due to increased name recognition in local community, as well as experience in lead role. Special thanks to co-researcher, J. Green.
The second test presents more positive results, due to success in test and in strengthened friendships and connections within SAFD. Special thank to co-researcher, S. J. Anderson.
Though the results of the third test are still in the lab, preliminary reports point to success, though the level of that success cannot be currently reported with accuracy. However, delivery of certain materials produced responses ranging from highly satisfactory to exemplary.
7. Publish results
Published in journal, Buddha’s Bellyaching, March 2008 edition.
Reference in shared resource, Facebook.
8. Retest (frequently done by other scientists)
So, I put it to you: Am I awesome? (Please note that any negative response may result in crushed ego, tears, tantrums, and verbose and tedious affirmation dialogue. You have been warned.)
Considering where the unfortunate actor met his end, this strikes me as inappropriate.
This deserves your attention. As sent to me by the Attack of Zack.
I’m having trouble determining whether my enjoying this article qualifies as misogyny, or healthy male pride.
As sent to me by the great Jeffron Hendrix, a study in the humour of exception.
Words fail. Fail? Word.
Tim sent me this demo of how item use and physics, rather than graphics alone, are getting an overhaul in the latest installment of Alone in the Dark. Interesting, but still not as open-ended as a system a colleague of mine was describing where every item in a game would have a socket and combining items would be organic and almost alchemical.
In his explanation, a flowerpot item and a flamethrower item could be combined, for example. It may end up with nothing terribly useful, but in the real world — if you wanted to — you could somehow “combine” those two things, so why not in the virtual? It’s a concept that he understands intrinsically, and of which I am stuck in the arithmetic, but interesting, nonetheless.
This video demonstrates some “real world rules” that I hope are a first step in that direction.
Gametrailers.com – Alone in the Dark 5 – Tech Demo Episode 1 HD
I think the perfect metaphor for my week is my fervent desire and apparent inability to solve a Rubik’s Cube. The colors taunt me with each side I nearly complete, that sense of accomplishment skirting around my periphery.
I’m going to code some freelance sites this week and at least solve some other people’s pretty puzzles.
SB: I haven’t had dinner yet.
MHG: Aw, you should eat something.
SB: Your love will sustain me.
MHG: I think there’s some chili, too.
