Log in

10/9/2007

Say good night, Gracie.

A nice little bit of IM fun from my day:

Most-Honoured Girlfriend: i got apples, pears, grapes and meat & cheese for sandwiches
Most-Honoured Girlfriend: (and mike & cereal)
Steelbuddha: You got Mike?
Steelbuddha: At the store?
Most-Honoured Girlfriend: yes, in the dairy csae
Steelbuddha: Weird. What do you suppose he was doing there?
Most-Honoured Girlfriend: he was chillin’
Steelbuddha: High-five, Rick!

Filed under: Ennui | | Comments (1)

10/3/2007

Perhaps you can trust this Apple, Eve.

Found on Digg, 8 reasons Windows users don’t switch.

I have to say this reminds me of a thought I posed to Most-Honoured Girlfriend in the car last week. We passed one of those cars that seemed painted with slogans, so ubiquitous were its bumper stickers. These stickers had expanded their territory well across the trunk and rear windshield. To a one, they were emblazoned with “clever” phrases designed not only to criticize the current political administration, but also to raise the ire of its supporters.

Said I to that person, though only Clare could hear, “Don’t do that. You’re not helping.” She turned to me. “What?”

My argument is thus. The current government is supported mainly by persons who would be generalized as conservative. Republicans are ostensibly the conservative party. The denotation of the word is “holding to traditional values and cautious regarding change or innovation.” The connotation of the word (not to say the ideology, neccessarily) is someone who is unlikely to change their opinion easily or quickly.

So, if a person of this ideology has been demonstrated that all persons of the opposite liberal viewpoint make inflammatory comments rather than argue logically, then the conservative person’s opinion will be formed. Next time they argue with someone of a liberal ideology, certain understandable prejudices will exist. Even the word “liberal” has come to mean something filthy to many conservatives, when really it only means someone “open to new behavior or opinions and willing to discard traditional values.”

This explains also the religious divide seen in the two-party system. Organized religion is certainly a traditional value, many of them having existed for thousands of years. Whereas the “godless” gravitate toward the political party that espouses* views less grounded in religion**.

Apple – PC is an easy analogy to liberal – conservative, hence the commercials which are likely another point of contention for a conservative person. Unfortunately, the suffers from the same arms-length mud-slinging between people. Many people are unwilling to even dip their toe in the other water, seemingly due to fear of an undertow.

So, knowing full well that many people are disappointed with their experience, I hold to my standard answer regarding computers: “If it does what you need it to, then you’ve got the right one.” But, I invite you to prove otherwise.

* – though in recent memory, parties have not cleaved to even their own values.
* – in the US, almost solely Christianity, which seems inappropriate considering our country was founded on freedom of religion

Filed under: Ennui | | Comments Off on Perhaps you can trust this Apple, Eve.

9/19/2007

My love affair with TED.

Filmed in 2003, but still relevant. Seth Godin: Sliced Bread and other marketing delights

It turns out I have the otaku.

Filed under: Ennui | | Comments Off on My love affair with TED.

OFN and the human condition.

Earlier today, like a good little member of the online social community (in which, my circle has grown by 4 friend requests just today, so eat it), I changed my Facebook status. I changed it to read “Christopher is … a lone monkey contemplating infinity.” I heard the phrase somewhere and it still resonates with me.

Evidently, it moved one of my friends as well, as she replied on my “wall” that infinity was a deep thought for a monkey to have. Immediately, I was reminded of an Ernest Cline spoken word piece called Dance, Monkeys, Dance. Without delay, I searched it out on youtube and sent it to her, after another viewing myself.

Since I am in a relatively new office, I thought I would also send it out to my colleagues, as it might make their day. It met with approval. I was pleased.

Then, after lunch, I went to Digg and discovered one of the top items listed was another version of the video on youtube. Now, I doubt it was any one I would have sent it to, as they likely would have posted the version I sent. Somehow, as one colleague theorized, I tapped into the great geek unconscious. Or perhaps, as Tim postulates, I am simply from the future.

Regardless, its appearance on Digg wounds my hipster bone – my “hip,” as I call it, but only ironically and only when people can hear me – much in the way that sudden public support of an underground band you’ve loved for years (I’m looking at you, Flight of the Conchords) can sting deeply, despite your seat at the reigns of the bandwagon.

So, as is the purpose of blogs, I hereby present proof that you heard it here first (after I found it, probably on MetaFilter): Buddha’s Bellyaching » A bit o’ the ol’ optimistic nihilism.

And no, I did not change the timestamp, you bastards.

Filed under: Ennui | | Comments Off on OFN and the human condition.

9/7/2007

Creativity as important as literacy

The speech found at the link below should be required to become a teacher. It reminds me of some of the larger concepts presented by Keith Johnstone in his remarkable book, Impro, which has been in my top five books for as long as I can remember. Give it a watch; twenty minutes well spent.

TED: Sir Ken Robinson on creativity

Filed under: Ennui | | Comments Off on Creativity as important as literacy

9/4/2007

Captain of a hardship

Discussing media with gamers (gamers in this case specifically meaning players of tabletop role-playing games) can be frustrating for me. My gamer friends, with few exceptions, are very bright people with a wealth of experience each. Their opinions are not often the result of simple preference, or so I choose to believe.

But there are occasions where I wonder what we really have in common. When the subject of media as art becomes the focus of conversation, our positions are so disparate as to be cause for argument. Half the time I don’t believe we are actually discussing the same subject.

Instead, I feel like they are weighing the entertainment value while I am weighing the intrinsic value. Entertainment is wonderful, and even schlock has its place, but it seems people give equal creedence to true art as to things that have no greater message.

The greatest example of this in recent memory is preference of Offices. The BBC original is fully formed, with realistic characters and scenarios and a truly human quality with the capacity to move one to catharsis as well as laughter. It is often thought-provoking and philosophical without reaching beyond the natural accessiblity of its material or genre. I would even go so far as to say it helped me gain perspective on my own life and where I truly want it to go.

The American version on the other hand rarely elevates itself above farcical sitcom stuff. The strongest human connection I have made is with the minor characters, such as Phyllis or Jan. I can see it being dated in five years, where the original I believe will stand the test of time.

It’s difficult to explain. It’s beyond what I can do on my little blog. But when we’re chatting and you tell me you prefer the American Office, my immediate prejudice — for better or worse — is that you prefer not to be challenged by your entertainment. It’s a bigger question than which you think is funnier. At least it is in my head.

Luv u. kthxbye.

Oh, and I fully expect to see arguments for and against in the comments, so … open season on pretentious little me.

Filed under: Ennui | | Comments (11)

8/16/2007

Sell it like Sanford.

There’s something inherently beautiful about this.

YTMND – Homeless Fred Sanford

Filed under: Ennui | | Comments (1)

8/13/2007

What is the sound of one phone ringing?

Filed under: Ennui | | Comments (1)

7/31/2007

Really rings a bell.

The attempt to pass an alternative fuel bill advocating the use of liquid coal has me thinking. Maybe there’s an energy source that we’ve overlooked. Solar, wind, geothermal, etc. are all better options, of course, but I’m talking about something that should be obvious from our childhood.

Think now… once upon a time, there was an engineer. Choo-choo Charlie was his name, we hear. He had an engine. And he sure had fun. He used Good ‘n’ Plenty candies to make his train run.

This isn’t just some crackpot we’re talking about here. It takes many years of intense academia to become an engineer. And so many people don’t like black licorice, I doubt we’d be in any sort of crisis any time soon. Besides… there’s plenty; it says so in the title.

I’m just putting it out there, legislators. It’s as well-conceived an idea as you’ve had so far.

Filed under: Ennui | | Comments (1)

7/3/2007

Piss and Moan, chapter 328.

I don’t like to be a complainer.

I am one, but I don’t like to be. So, I hide this entry behind a link. You choose to read my moaning at your own peril.

Any moment now, though, life/fate/whatever-you-call-it can just stop running up at random and kicking me square in the balls.

(more…)

Filed under: Ennui | | Comments Off on Piss and Moan, chapter 328.
« Previous PageNext Page »