Log in

6/7/2005

MHG and I discuss marriage

(Before anyone gets on my case, the wedding I ushed this weekend was lovely and I had fun. That doesn’t change my stance. If you want to be married, more power to you. Does that mean I have to?)

SB: I don’t need the legality thing. I wouldn’t legally get married unless there were some outstanding legal issue that needed resolution. And the ceremony part (whether religious or not) is pretty self-absorbed and puts stress on everyone involved. I just do not get it.

MHG: It’s totally a girl thing. Being married is co-ed. A wedding is a girl thing.

SB: I’m not proposing at this moment, but if I asked you to marry me, would you be allright without a license and a ceremony? Could I take you on a honeymoon, give you a symbol of my commitment, throw a big bash for our friends and family, and be done with it?

MHG: Using wedding terms, a “ring” and “reception?”

SB: A ring and a reception, yes.

MHG: I’m not concerned with anything right now; what concerns me most about the lack of legality is children, but we don’t need to worry about that now either. It really is all about being “their day,” a day for the people getting married.

SB: But people shouldn’t stress about such a thing. I mean, a party doesn’t need months of planning.

MHG: I think the point is to be a spectacle.

SB: Then they should put on a play or something. If you’re going to say “Look at me! Look at us! We’re special!” then it should come with an act. You should have to entertain your guests with more than a bad DJ.

MHG: What, like in Lemony Snicket? or “Wedding: The Movie?” “One man…one woman…”

SB: Yeah, ’cause then you could edit out all the bullshit.

MHG: And the parents could buy the long director’s cut with all the crap that makes moms’ eyes tear up.

SB: Most weddings would just be a trailer, anyway. And, as we know, none of the good parts of the trailer show up in the movie.

MHG: “Wedding: The Trailer,” “Marriage: The Movie.”

6/3/2005

Writers write.

Apparently, I am dying of some creeping mucousy plague, and this is making my fingers too weak to type. In fact, in order to make this semi-post, I had to commission a translation and typing expert (we’ll call her Navis Deacon) to listen to my stuffy, dripping mouthings and convert them into passable English. That and someone’s getting married this weekend and I am to ush. Therefore, no posts. I’ve got a few drafts hidden beyond the veil of blog administration for the \_337 |-|@xX0®zz among you, but the rest of you are just going to have to wait until they’re leaked to the P2P networks.

Love doesn’t rhyme with cholera,
sb

Filed under: Ennui,Self-service | | Comments Off on Writers write.

5/26/2005

Run test pattern 7. The one with the monkey.

I just haven’t had anything worth saying.

Filed under: Ennui | | Comments Off on Run test pattern 7. The one with the monkey.

5/19/2005

Miscellaneous Blades

One of these swords has the unique claim that the blade itself weighs over 100 lbs. Read the fine print first. Then enjoy.

Miscellaneous Blades

Filed under: Found Art | | Comments Off on Miscellaneous Blades

5/18/2005

I’d sure like to knight him…with a steamroller

Titles I hereby bestow upon George Lucas in light of his continued desctruction of his own accidental masterpieces from the early 70’s (an homage to McSweeney’s Lists):

Defiler of Memories
Wonder-reaver
Ruiner of Heroes
Pilferer of Joy
He Who Should Not Write Dialogue
Profit-mongering Awesomeness Collapser

Care to add any?

5/16/2005

When the cat’s away, the mice make websites.

So, MHG visited some anime thing this weekend to promote her new online store which meant that I had to make the online store a reality before anyone went to visit it. In the interest of promotion, both self and otherwise, I bring you:

Cy•Ren Gear and Games

If you’re so inclined, throw a link our way. We could use the meta-promotion of link popularity. I’ll be your best friend.

Filed under: For the geek in you | | Comments Off on When the cat’s away, the mice make websites.

5/13/2005

Too right. Too wrong.

Last night, MHG and I were up late (she worked until 3a.m., God bless her) working on her online store. As we searched Da Web for images, we came across a Magic: the Gathering card with a little picture of Isaac from the Love Boat on it. This prompted me to intone The Love Boat theme song repeatedly in my brain as I stumblingly made our bacon and eggs.

In some yet unjustified leap of subject matter, my brain then skipped to singing “I’m burnin’, I’m burnin’, I’m burnin’ for you.” I haven’t any idea which artist created the song, nor what the song is actually called, but there it was like Big Bird crossing the street against the lights, unexpected and unavoidable.

As though to make it up to me, my brain tried to turn it into a joke. To this end it made the giant leap of changing the lyric to “I’m Vernon, I’m Vernon, etc.” Apart from the brief vision of Charo shaking and singing the song in her trilling soprano, this was not the comedy goldmine that my dreaming self seemed to think it was. So, I tried to apply my vast intellect to the problem.

The best I came up with was to write a punk song called “I’m your Vernon Jordan.” A love song, you see, with a bridge section that is a cover of the aforementioned shitty song. Better than my first idea of an internet meme flash movie of Uncle Vernon from the Harry Potter movies doing a little 4 frame dance with a dislocated-looking jaw.

I’m your Vernon Jordan by punk band Killdumpster
(with apologies,since I have almost no real knowledge of the problem surrounding him)

You’re in the spotlight
Arkansas’ hot nights
You need someone to get you outta the fire

Got a dispute over land
Baby just take my hand
‘Cause I’m your well-respected, perjury-lovin’ liar!

Let me be your Vernon Jordan!
Let me tell the truth accordin’ to what’s best for you!
Let me be your Vernon Jordan!

I’m Vernon, I’m Vernon, I’m Vernon for you!

Something like that. I never said it would be good.

Filed under: Ennui | | Comments Off on Too right. Too wrong.

5/12/2005

“We’re Christian!” “A-HA!”

Von Herwig, Man of La Machina, clued me in to these hilarious new Eugene Mirman epics. Keep in mind these are real calls. I’ve mirrored thm here, but please click on the link below and show him some link love.

Anti-Gay Phone Company
Anti-Gay Phone Company: Part 2

Call me an alarmist, but to me this is just viral marketing. These companies are preying on the ignorance of some people in order to make money. It’s absolutely sick. And by sick, I mean AWESOME. And by AWESOME, I mean Republican.

Eugene Mirman: Latest News and Shows

Filed under: Link Larceny | | Comments Off on “We’re Christian!” “A-HA!”

5/11/2005

Christ is not speaking to the press

Some weird God-related web nonsense.

God.com would like you to remember that God does not have or need a website.

CNN.com – Jesus Christ in legal battle to get license – May 10, 2005

Filed under: Found Art | | Comments (1)

5/8/2005

Kingdom of Heaven

For Mother’s Day, MHG suggested we take her mum to see Kingdom of Heaven when she got into town. I’m a bad son and had been too distracted to solidify plans with my mother to do anything. She’s a busy lady, so I’m sure she got a lot done in my absence.

This was not a film I had expected to see. In fact, being without television and radio for most of the time, I hadn’t heard a thing about it. MHG mentioned something about the crusades and Liam Neeson, which was enough to pique my interest, and apparently her mother’s. Apart from the brief Liam Neeson in the very beginning, however, I think I left more satisfied than she.

Ridley Scott produced and directed this epic about Jerusalem, with no attempt to veil the subtextual message about the Iraqi War. The opening credits of his production company, Scott Free, gave the impression of a very film-student-oriented approach. And for the first hour and a half or so, you can see why this director has earned his spurs and that he may be making an attempt to return to his film roots. Scott makes Orlando Bloom into a quiet, principled and simple man. And you believe that Bloom has spent many a hard year as a blacksmith (again) and humble servant of God.

Until he talks too much. I would have to characterize Bloom’s acting in the same way as I do Keanu Reeves, at least in this film. I don’t harp on Reeves in the same way most do; Reeves has very expressive face and body language, and often performs well enough. It is his voice which is flat and lacking in emotion, even when he strains to convince the audience otherwise. In this way, he is suited fairly well to action heroes or quiet types.

Similar is Orlando Bloom, whose face tells a great story. But when left in the climax of the film to rally the troops, his speech and presence fail and what could have brought this film to the peak of an emotional crescendo instead drops it flat on its face. Bloom’s slack is picked up admirably by strong-faced newcomer Ghassan Massoud, but not enough to balance the two sides. Scott does a fine job of making neither side seem like the “bad guy,” but you end up admiring Saladin (Massoud) and dreading another speech by Balein (Bloom).

Even when you accept the good writing/bad delivery scenario, the director trips again, this time into the typical Ridley Scott fascination with shakily-shot, gory battle scenes. The defense of Jerusalem goes on far too long, despite the realism of stretching a battle over several days. Soon, the violence is glossed over. The ground-stirring speeches attempting to raise morale are off-handedly played by Bloom, who looks more like an actor who’s got nowhere to go than a war-weary general trying to fight on principle.

The love story is a laughable echo of that from Gladiator, and the latter third of the film seems like Scott’s gotten into a rut similar to Mel Gibson’s hero-mold from Braveheart.

This film will make you believe in its greatness, even with a heavy-handed message about peace in the Middle East. (MHG: “I didn’t need that last byline or whatever; I got the point.”) Liam Neeson, Jeremy Irons, David Thewlis and I guess Edward Norton or Jon Finch (King Baldwin and Jerusalem are credited; I’m not sure who is who) deliver star-cementing performances (welcome back, Jeremy).

If possible, cut the movie’s war scenes by 50% and most of Bloom’s speeches and you’ve really got something. Knowing Ridley Scott’s idea of pacing though, the director’s cut will probably feature 22 more minutes of beautifully shot boredom.

« Previous PageNext Page »